Rebasing also “rewrites” history which means that merging your branch becomes absolutely impossible. That means resolving the same conflicts again and again. Since your adaptions are never merged back into the upstream repository, each time you rebase you will have to rebase everything you've ever done. Rebasing your changes onto the current state of upstream is not a viable solution in the long term, especially if your changes are more than a handful of commits. At some point, there will likely be conflicts, and you will need to resolve them manually. They are just part of a naming convention that Git follows.There is no easy way to get updates from upstream while maintaining local changes to the code base. Both of these names can be changed by the user and have nothing special about them. Master is the default name given to the first branch present in a Git repository when it is initialized. Origin is the remote repository from where we cloned our local repository and we will be pushing and pulling changes to it. Origin and master are just two default names used commonly by Git. And now the remote repository will be the origin of our local repository. We will also have a remote-tracking branch called origin/master that will track the changes in the remote master branch. Now, if we clone this repository to our local system, then we will get a local master branch with all three commits. Suppose we have a remote repository with just a single branch called master with three commits on it. Now that we know about the general terminology, let's see what actually happens when we clone a repository. If we had changed the name of our remote from origin to genesis and the name of the remote branch was main instead of master, then instead of having origin/master, we will have the name genesis/main.Any branch of the format / is a remote tracking branch.The origin in origin/master is used to denote the remote name and the master is used to denote the remote branch that it is tracking.Origin/master is just a remote-tracking branch present in our local repository that tracks the changes made to the master branch in the remote repository.We just learned that origin and master are two different things but sometimes we may get confused when we see the word origin/master.We can rename this branch by using the -m flag with the Git Branch command. Now, we can run the Git Branch command and see that we only have a single branch in our repository which is called the master. We will create an empty commit because a branch is just a pointer to a commit, and we will need one to view the master branch(the branch name is also visible in blue color next to the path of our directory). This name is just used to denote that it is the main branch of our repository.Ĭonsider the following example where we initialize a new Git repository. Again, there is nothing exceptional about this name, and we can rename our master branch to something else.All other branches will be created based on some commit of this branch and will eventually merge into the master branch. This branch will have the final, up-to-date, production-ready code.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |